Log in

Maintenance of sorghum (sorghum bicolor, poaceae) landrace diversity by farmers’ selection in Ethiopia

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We quantitatively examined the relationships between Sorghum landrace diversity at the field level and environmental factors and farmers’ selection practices in north Shewa and south Welo regions of Ethiopia. Surveys were conducted on 260 randomly selected farmers’ fields. The altitude and size of each field were recorded. Sorghum plants at 5 m intervals along transect lines spaced 10 m apart over each field were identified by the farmers and the owner of each field was asked why she/he decided to grow each plant. Soil samples were collected from all of the fields and analyzed for pH, organic content, and sand, silt and clay content. Simple and polynomial regressions and multiple regression analyses showed that Sorghum landrace diversity at the field level had significant relationships with the number of selection criteria used by the farmers, field altitude, field size, pH and clay content. As the number of selection criteria increased, landrace diversity in the fields increased. This relationship was not a result of the correlation between selection criteria and the environmental factors, because it was significant after statistically correcting for the effects of the environmental variables. This study quantitatively confirms the role of traditional farmers in the maintenance of sorghum landrace diversity in north Shewa and south Welo regions of Ethiopia.

Zusammenfassung

Wir untersuchten quantitative Zusammenhänge zwischen der Diversität vonSorghum (Anzahl der Getreidevariationen) im Feld sowie Umweltfaktoren und Auswahlkriterien von Farmern im nördlichen Shewa und im südlichen Welo in Äthiopien. Die Untersuchung wurde an einer Stichprobe von 260 Feldern durchgeführt. Für jedes Feld wurden Höhenlage und Größe erfaßt. Sorghum Pflanzen wurden an den Schnittpunkten eines 5 x 10 Meter Rasters über jedes Feld von Farmern identifiziert und jeder Eigentümer wurde nach dem Grund des Anbaus der Pflanze befragt. Wir entnahmen Bodenproben von jedem Feld, welche auf PH Wert, Gehalt von organischem Material, Sand, Schlick und Lehm analysiert wurden. Einfache, polynomische und mehrfache Regressionsanalysen zeigten signifikante Beziehungen zwischen der Diversität vonSorghum und der Anzahl von Auswahlkriterien der Farmer—Höhenlage, Feldgröße, PH und Lehmgehalt. Mit Zunahme der Auswahlkriterien erhöhte sich die Diversität vonSorghum im Feld. Dieser signifikante Zusammenhang war nicht das Ergebnis der Korrelation zwischen den Auswahlkriterien und Umweltfaktoren, da wir vorher den Effekt der Umweltfaktoren ausge-glichen hatten. Diese Studie quantifiziert die Bedeutung traditioneller Farmer für die Diversität von Sorghum im nördlichen Shewa und im südlichen Welo in Äthiopien.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams, M. W.,A. W. Ellingboe,and E. C. Rossman. 1971. Biological uniformity and disease epidemics. Bioscience 21:1067–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. 1995. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, M. R. 1991. The ethnoecology of maize variety management: A case study from Mexico. Economic Botany 19:389–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and S. B. Brush. 1994. Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Botany 48:196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. D.,E. Breedlove,and P. H. Raven. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75: 214–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. 1985. Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: evidence from Aguaruna cultivars ofManihot esulenta. Economic Botany 39:310–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L. 1983. Genetic diversity and genetic vulnerability-an appraisal. Economic Botany 37:4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. 1995. In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Science 35:346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,Bellon, and Taylor. 1992. Technology adoption and biological diversity in Andean potato agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 39: 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B.,H. J. Carney,and Z. Huaman. 1981. Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Economic Botany 35:70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. 1983. Rural development: Putting the last first. Longman Inc., Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D. L. 1985. Harvest security and intraspecific diversity in traditional agriculture. Economic Botany 39:56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J. A. 1978. The quest for tolerant germplasm. Pages 1-61in G. A. Jung, ed., Crop tolerance to subtropical land conditions. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication Number 32, 343 p.

  • Dyer, J. A.,A. Teshome,and J. K.Torrance. 1993. Agroclimatic profiles for uniform productivity areas in Ethiopia. Water International 18:189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —,and —. 1992. A climate analysis package for land use planning in Ethiopia. Canadian Water Resources Journal 17:311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., andP. Mooney. 1990. Shattering. Food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H. 1974. Genetic conservation: Our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics 78:53–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galinat, W. C. 1992. Evolution of corn. Advances in Agronomy 47:510–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. 1975. Crops and Man. The American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and the Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,J. M. J. De Wet andE. G. Price. 1972. Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27: 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. G. 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. L. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. B. andM. W. Adams. 1987. Landraces ofPhaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in Northern Malawi. I. Regional variation. Economic Botany 41: 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourn, J. 1965. Falling drop used for grain-size analysis of fine-grained materials. Sedimentology 5: 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, N. J. T.,C. J. Pearson,and P. G. E. Searle. 1984. The ecology of tropical food crops. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, M. L. andJ. B. Alcorn. 1987. Conservation of traditional agroecosystems. Bioscience. 37:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualset, C. O. 1975. Sampling germplasm in a center of diversity: an example of disease resistance in Ethiopian barley. Pages 81–96in O. H. Frankel and J. G. Hawkes, eds., Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C. F.,S. B. Brush,D. S. Douches,K. S. Zimmer,and G. Huestis. 1990. Biochemical and folk assessment of variability of Andean cultivated potatoes. Economic Botany 44:254–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salick, J.,N. Cellinese,and S. Knapp. 1997. Indigenous diversity of cassava: generation, maintenance, use and loss among the Amuesha, Peruvian upper Amazon. Economic Botany 51:6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1992. SAS/STAT User’s manual. Volume I. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiz, L. andE. Zeiger. 1991. Plant physiology. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshome, A. 1990. Uniform productivity areas and land degradation risk in Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Geography, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,B. R. Baum,L. Fahrig,J. K. Torrance,and J. D. Lambert. 1997. Sorghum landrace variation and classification in north Shewa and south Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97:255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,L. Fahrig,B. R. Baum,J. K. Torrence,T. J. Arnason,and J. D. Lambert. 1999. Traditional farmers’ knowledge of sorghum landrace [Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae)] storability in Ethiopia. Economic Botany 53:xx-xx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. andA. El Haddi. 1992. Drought and Biodiversity in Grasslands. Oecologia. 89:257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. 1992. Conserving and increasing on-farm genetic diversity: Farmer management of varietal bean mixtures in central Africa. Pages 34–51in J. L. Moock and R. E. Rhoades, eds., Diversity, farmer knowledge and sustainability. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. andW. A. Niering. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina mountains, Arizona. Veg etation biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology. 56:771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B. 1943. Area and number of species. Nature 152:264–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1985. The biological diversity crisis. Bioscience 35:700–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. 1996. Changing fortunes: biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian Andes. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teshome, A., Fahrig, L., Torrance, J.K. et al. Maintenance of sorghum (sorghum bicolor, poaceae) landrace diversity by farmers’ selection in Ethiopia. Econ Bot 53, 79–88 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860796

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860796

Key Words

Navigation