Abstract
An AC differential resistivity technique has been developed to follow the progress of annealing during the heat treatment of cold worked a brass and copper. The method allowed monitoring of all three stages of annealing, i.e., recovery, recrystallization, and grain growth. The decrease in room temperature resistivity due to recrystallization was ∼13 pct and ∼ pct for α brass and copper, respectively. The change in fractional resistivity resulting from primary recrystallization was ∼60 pct for α brass and ∼80 pct for copper; the resistivity method was particularly useful for determining the end point of this stage. Grain growth accounted for a smaller change in fractional resistivity (∼10 pct for α brass and 5 pct for copper); thus, in its present form, the technique is suitable for following only relatively large changes in grain size, of the order of 10 microns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Hautojarvi, J. Johannson, A. Vehanen, J. Yli-Kauppila, P. Girard, and C. Minier:J. Phys. F., 1980, vol. 11, pp. 1337–45.
M. L. Johnson, S. Saterlie, D. Boice, and J. G. Byrne:Phys. Status Solidi, 1978, vol. 48, pp. 551–54.
G. Dlubek, O. Brümmer, and N. Meyendorf:Solid State Commun., 1978, vol. 27, pp. 1219–22.
G. Dlubek, O. Brümmer, and A. Alam:Solid State Commun., 1979, vol. 29, pp. 597–99.
L. M. Clarebrough, M. E. Hargreaves, and G. W. West:Proc. R. Soc. London, 1955, vol. A232, pp. 252–70.
L. M. Clarebrough, M. E. Hargreaves, and M. H. Lorretto:Proc. R. Soc. London, 1960, vol. A257, pp. 363–85.
W. B. Muir and J. O. Ström-Olsen:J. Phys. E, 1976, vol. 9, pp. 163–64.
G. W. Ardley and A. H. Cottrell:Proc. R. Soc. London, 1953, vol. A219, pp. 328–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drew, R.A.L., Muir, W.B. & Williams, W.M. Differential resistivity measurement for monitoring annealing. Metall Trans A 14, 175–182 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651613
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651613