Log in

Régime alimentaire des alevins de Gardons (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) dans un port du lac Léman. Comparison avec la nourriture disponible

  • Published:
Swiss journal of hydrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine the food preferences of young roach, gut contents of roach fry (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) were compared with the evolution of the zooplankton community in a littoral area of Lake Geneva during June and July 1985.

The food of roach fry up the age of 30 d (10–15 mm standard length) was mainly small Rotifers with some Chronomid larvae. Thereafter, Chironomid larvae constitute the major part of the diet until the fry leave the littoral zone at the age of about 45 d (15–23 mm).

The relevance of classical food preference analysis is critically discussed in view of the heterogeneous spatial distribution of invertebrates observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bohl, E.: Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding in planktivorous Fish. Oecologia44, 368–375 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassie, R. M.: Sampling and statistics. In: Edmondson, W. T., et Winberg, G. G. (éd.) A manual on methods for the assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters, 1re éd. IBP Handbook,17, 175–209. Blackwell, Oxford and Edinburgh (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chesson, J.: Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology59 (2), 211–215 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumont, H. J., Van de Velde, J., et Dumont, S.: The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia19, 75–97 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillet, C.: La reproduction des poissons du Léman. Rapport ATP-INRA, p. 20–40 (1985).

  6. Grigorash, V. A., Spanovkaya, V. D., et Lebedeva, T. V.: The availability of food to underyearling roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in Mozhaysk reservoir. J. Ichthyol.12 (3), 457–465 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., et Werner, E. E.: An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr.15, 859–928 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer, C.: Feeding behavior of roach (Rutilus rutilus) larvae and the fry of perch (Perca fluviatilis) in lake Lankau, Arch. Hydrobiol.103 (1), 61–74 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartmann, J.: Two feeding strategies of young fishes. Arch. Hydrobiol.96 (4), 496–509 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofer, R., et Uddin, A. N.: Digestive processes during the development of the roachRutilus rutilus (L.). J. Fish Biol.26 (6), 683–689 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyslop, E. J.: Stomac content analysis; a review of methods and their applications. J. Fish Biol.17, 411–429 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jorgensen, S. E.: Handbook of environmental data and ecological parameters. International Society for Ecological Modelling, pp. 1–1162 (1979).

  13. Lauzanne, L.: Régimes alimentaires et relations trophiques des poissons du lac Tchad. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Hydrobiol.10, 267–310 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lazzaro, X.: Selective feeding of planktovorous fishes: a review of behaviors, mechanisms and impacts. Hydrobiologia146 (2), 97–167.

  15. Lechowicz, M. J.: The sampling characteristics of selectivity indices. Oecologia52, 22–30 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien, W. J., et Vinyard, G. L.: Comment on the use of Ivlev’s selectivity index with planktivorous fish. J. Fish Res. Bd Canada31, 1427–1429 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Politou, C. Y.: La prédation des alevins de Gardons (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) et de Perches (Perca fluviatilis L.) sur le zooplancton dans le lac de Créteil (Val de Marne). Rapp. DEA Ecologie, Univ. Paris6, 1–43 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ponton, D.: Croissance et alimentation de deux poissons planctonophages du lac Léman: le Corégone (Coregonus schinzii palea Jurine) et le Gardon (Rutilus rutilus (L.)). Thèse 3e cycle, Univ. Cl. Bernard Lyon I, p. 1–158 (1986).

  19. Siefert, R. E.: First food of karval Yellow Perch, White Sucker, Bluegill, Emerald Shiner, and Rainbow Smelt. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.101 (2), 219–225 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel, S.: Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Int. student edition. Mac Graw-Hill, Koga kusha, Tokyo, p. 1–312 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stroffek, S.: L’échantillonnage quantitatif du zooplancton dans les herbiers submergés littoraux du lac Léman: méthodes, limites et motivations. Rapp. DEA Univ. Lyon I, p. 1–34 (1985).

  22. Winfield, I. J., Peirson, G., Gryer, M., et Ownsend, C. R.: The behavioral basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abramis brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) Freshwat. Biol.13 (2), 139–149 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponton, P.D., Stroffek, S. Régime alimentaire des alevins de Gardons (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) dans un port du lac Léman. Comparison avec la nourriture disponible. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol 49, 329–342 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538293

Navigation