SpringerLink
Log in

Double-level languages and co-operative working

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four criteria are discussed as important conditions of successful applications in Computer Supported Co-operative Work (CSCW). They are equality, mutual influence, new competence, and double-level language. The criteria originate in the experience of the International Co-operative Movement. They are examined and illustrated withreference to eight contemporary CSCW applications: meeting scheduling and support; bargaining; co-authoring; co-ordination; planning; design support and collaborative design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. (1963).Social Choice and Individual Values. J. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1962).How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L., Bjorn-Andersen, N. and Due-Thomsen, B. (1988). Computer support for co-operative work: an appraisal and critique. In H.J. Bullingeret al. (eds)EURINFO '88: First European Conf. on Information Technology for Organisational Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1975). Fanfare for effective freedom: cybernetic praxis is government. InPlatform for Change. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm (second edition). Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. (1980).Workplace Democratization: Its Internal Dynamics. Transaction Books, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B.J. and Thomas, E.J. (1969).Role Theory. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikson, T.K., Bair, J.H., Barry R. and Grantham, C.E. (1988). (Panel Discussion) Communication, co-ordination, and group performance. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–28 September 1988.

  • Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. (1988). The memoirs of two survivors: or the evaluation of a computer system for co-operative work. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–28 September 1988.

  • Blair, D. and Pollak, R. (1983). Rational collective choice. InScientific American, Vol. 249, No. 2, August 1983. Scientific American, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, A. (1986). Interest and equity: uses of employee ownership and participation in the restructuring of the U.S. steel industry. BA Thesis: Harvard College, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodker, S., Pelle, E., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M., and Madsen, K. (1988). Computer support for co-operative design. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Bowers, J. and Churcher, J. (1988). Local and global structuring of computer mediated communication: develo** linguistic perspectives on CSCW in COSMOS. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Bowers, J. and Wilson, P. (1989).EC-CSCW '89: Proc. of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Gatwick, London, 13–15 September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974).Labour and Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T.R. and Ueberhorst (1988).Creative Democracy. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (1978).A Comparative Study of Three Major Workers' Co-operatives: Final Report. SSRC, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (1984). Alternative modes of co-operative production. InEconomic & Industrial Democracy, Vol. 5. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. (ed.) (1988).Develo** Local Economic Strategies. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (1988).The Art of Work: An Epitaph to Skill. Pluto, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1987).Hypertext: an introduction and survey. Computer. September 1987. IEEE.

  • Conklin, J. and Begeman, M.L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Cooley, M. (1980).Architect or Bee? Hand & Brain, Slough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C., Thomas, A., Lewis, J. and Speare, R. (1988).Develo** Successful Worker Co-operatives. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. InCommunications of the ACM. November.

  • de Zeeuw, G. and Robinson, M. (1989).Support, Survival, & Culture: An Introduction to the OOC Research Program. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, T. (1988). Organisational dinosaurs take on a human face. InComputing 3 November 1988. VNU Business Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (1979). The Basque workers co-operatives.Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, T. (1981).Under New Management. Pan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egido, C. (1988). Videoconferencing as a technology to support group work: a review of its failure. InProceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–29 September 1988.

  • Ehn, P. (1988).Work Oriented Design of Computer Artefacts. Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S.F. (1987a). Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems.ACM TOOIS. 5.

  • Ehrlich, S.F. (1987b) Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communication systems. InProc. CHI+GI '87 Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, 5–9 April 1987).

  • Elster, J. (1978).Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Wiley Chichester.

  • Eveland, J.D. and Bikson, T.K. (1988). Work group structures and computer support: a field experiment. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Fairclough, M. (1987).Mondragon in Context Research Report, Dept. of Sociology, University of Bristol. Bristol.

  • Fairclough, M. (1986).An analysis of Triumph Meriden Motorcycles Ltd. 1975–1983. PhD, Bristol University.

  • Flores, F.C. (1982).Management and Communication in the Office of the Future. Hermenet Inc., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, O., Ivanov, K., and Torbjorn, N. (1988). A co-constructive view of the information society: the case of the NUDU project in Unea, Sweden. Draft photocopy.

  • Freeman, J. (1973). The tyranny of structurelessness.Berkeley Journal of Sociology (17) 1972–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel, J. (1983).The Cathedral Builders. Michael Russell, Wilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLC (Greater London Council) (1985).The London Industrial Strategy. GLC, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, C.E. and Carasik, R.P. (1988).The Phenomenology of Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Interpersonal Software, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. (1988). In search of co-operation: an historical analysis of work organisation and management strategies. InProceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–29 September 1988.

  • Greif, I. (ed.) (1988).Computer Supported Co-operative Work: A Book of Readings. Morgan Kaufmann, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, I. and Suchman, L. (eds) (1988).CSCW '88: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–29 September 1988.

  • Griffiths, P. (1988). Personal communication.

  • Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organisational interfaces. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–29 September 1988.

  • Halasz, F.H., Moran, T.P. and Trigg, R.H. (1987). Notecards in a nutshell. InProc. of the ACM CHI+GI '87 Conference. 5–9 april 1987. Toronto, Canada.

  • Hiltz, S.R. (1988). Collaborative learning in a virtual classroom: highlights of findings. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon, 26–28 September 1988.

  • Hirschheim, R.A. (1985).Office Automation — A Social and Organisational Perspective. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. (1988).Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Olson, M. and Weaver, G. (1986). Using a computer-based tool to support collaboration: a field experiment.Human Relations.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M. (1988). Designing for a dollar a day. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Landry, C., Morley, D., Southwood, R. and Wright, P. (1986).What a Way to Run a Railroad: An Analysis of Radical Failure. Comedia, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren, L. (1989). Cybernetics, science, and complementarity. InProc. Mutual Uses of Science and Cybernetics Conf. 27 March-1 April. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1988).Computer Supported Co-operative Work (CSCW) — Issues and Challenges. Dept. of Computer Science, University of Jyvåskylå, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L. (1987). Towards a ‘critical mass’ theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependence, and diffusion.Communications Research, Vol. 14 (5), October.

  • Marshall, C.M. (1987).Exploring Representation Problems using Hypertext. Hypertext '87 Papers. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 13–15 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1989). Personal communication.

  • Martz, B. (1989). Personal communication.

  • Mellor, M.et al. (1988).Worker Co-operatives in Theory and Practice. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1984). The manager's job: folklore and fact. In D.S. Pugh (ed.)Organisation Theory. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986)Images of Organization. Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. (1969). Man computer interaction: a challenge for human factors research.IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 10, 164–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J.F., Applegate, L.M. and Konsynski, B.R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity: experience with a group decision support system.Journal of Management Information Systems. Spring Vol. 3, No. 4.

  • Nunamaker, J.F., Konsynski, B.R. and Applegate, L.M. (1988). Computer aided deliberation: model management and group decision support.Operational Research, Nov./Dec.

  • Nygaard, C. (1988). Plenary address:EURINFO '88. First European Conference on Information Technology for Organisational Systems. Athens, 16–20 May. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University (1986).Co-operative Working. Open University Press (Centre for Continuing Education), Milton Keynes.

  • Pask, G. (1978). A conversation theoretic approach to social systems. In F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds)Sociocybernetics. Martinus Nijhof, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1980). The Limits of Togetherness. In S.H. Lavington (ed.)Proc. Information Processing '80. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R. (1978).Some Problems of Co-operative Organisation. CRU Monograph No. 3. Open University, Milton Keynes.

  • Poltrock, S.E. (1988).Protocol Analysis. MCC Technical Report. Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C. (1988). Personal communication.

  • Pugh, D. (ed.) (1984).Organization Theory. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, G.L. (1989). Personal communication.

  • Rein, G.L. and Ellis, C.A. (1988).The Nick Summer Experiment: A Field Study of the Usage of Meeting Support Technology by Software Design Teams. MCC Technical Report No. STP-018-88. Austin, Texas.

  • Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.Policy Sciences, Vol. 9.

  • Robinson, M.J. (1987). Pay bargaining in workers' co-operatives. InCybernetics and Systems: The Way Ahead. Vol. 2. Thales Publications. Lytham St. Annes. and in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds)Sociocybernetics, Vol. 4.

  • Robinson, M.J. (1989). Mass conversation: an examination of computer techniques for many to many communications. CRU, Open University, Milton Keynes.

  • Robinson, M. (1984).Groups. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. and Paton, R. (1983).Worker Information Systems and the Development of Large Co-operatives. CRU Working Paper. Open University, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. and Whitt, J. (1986).The Co-operative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D.M., Moran, T.P. and Jordan, D.S. (1987). The instructional design environment. In J. Psotka, L.D. Massey and S.A. Mutter (eds)Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. (1979).Work Organisations: Resistance and Control. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, G. and Hirschheim, R. (1988). A new approach to office requirements analysis. InProc. EURINFO '88: First European Conference on Information Technology for Organisational Systems. Athens, 16–20 May. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Morton, M.S. (1978).Decision Support Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1979).Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1988). The management of usability. InProc. EURINFO '88: First European Conference on Information Technology for Organisational Systems. Athens, 16–20 May. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, B. (1983). Co** with Complexity.Office Technology and People, No. 1. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M.et al. (1987). Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving meetings.Communications of the ACM, Vol. 30, No. 1, Jan.

  • Stryjan, Y. (1987).Impossible Organisations: On Self-Management and Organisational Reproduction. University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.A. (1987).Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1906).On the Art of Cutting Metals. ASME, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1947).Scientific Management. Harper & Row.

  • Thornley, J. (1981).Workers' Co-operatives — Jobs and Dreams. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin. S. (1956).The Use of Argument. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, R.H. (1988). Guided tours and tabletops: tools for communication in a Hypertext environment. InProc. Conf. on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Portland, Oregon. 26–28 September 1988.

  • Trigg, R.H., Suchman, L.A. and Hallasz, F.G. (1986). Supporting collaboration in notecards. InProc. Conf. Computer Supported Co-operative Work, Austin, Texas. 3–5 December 1986.

  • Trigg, R.H., Moran, T.P. and Hallasz, F.G. (1987). Adaptability and tailorability in notecards. InProc. INTERACT '87, Stuttgart, West Germany. September 1987.

  • United Nations (1987).National Experience in Promoting the Co-operative Movement: Report of the Secretary General. United Nations Economic & Social Council.

  • Vogel, D., Nunamaker, J.F., Applegate, L.M. and Konsynski, B.R. (Forthcoming)Group Decision Support Systems: Determinants of Success.

  • Watkins, W.P. (1986).Co-operative Principles Today and Tomorrow. Holyoake Books, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, B. (1986).The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology. Gower, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artefacts have politics?Daedelus, Winter, 1980.

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986).Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OOC Program, University of Amsterdam, Grote Bickersstraat 72, 1013 KS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Mike Robinson

Authors
  1. Mike Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, M. Double-level languages and co-operative working. AI & Soc 5, 34–60 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891356

Keywords

Search

Navigation