Log in

Comparison of single current dipole and Magnetic Field Tomography analyses of the cortical response to auditory stimuli

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Measurements of the magnetic field elicited by a 50 ms long auditory stimulus, from three normal subjects and one head injured subject, are used to estimate the three dimensional distribution of generators in the brain. The resulting images are compared with point source solutions obtained with the usual single current dipole fitting procedures, over a latency range which includes the extrema in the (average) measured signal. In all cases considered, 100 or so epochs time-locked to the stimulus were magnetically recorded. These were averaged, and then analyzed using two techniques; a new distributed current model known as Magnetic Field Tomography (MFT), and the standard single current dipole (SCD) model. Both methods provide estimates of the current generators in the brain. In two of the normal subjects, the MFT solutions are super-imposed onto Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) of the relevant cortical area. The results show that when the SCD model provides a reasonable description of the data, the MFT estimate shows one dominant localized region in agreement with the current dipole position. In the MFT sequence of solutions the activity evolves smoothly; multiple areas of activity often arise as the focal activity in one region declines while focal activity in another region grows. In contrast the SCD solutions during these intermediate periods fit the data poorly, and may move erratically from one locale to another. We conclude that MFT seems to provide a reasonable description of the activity through cortical and subcortical regions. The evolution of activity, as derived from the average signal, can be traced continuously from the onset of the stimulus, not just at the peaks. This could be particularly important for clinical applications where injury or other pathology produce a response with no clear dipolar pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clarke, C.J.S. and Janday, B.S. The solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem by maximum statistical entropy. Inverse Problems, 1989, 5: 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C.J.S. Probabilistic methods in a biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems, 1989, 5: 999–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G.R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J.G. and Schomer, D.L. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol., 1990, 28: 811–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Preprint TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology, 1984.

  • Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. and Lounasmaa, O.V. MEG versus EEG localization test (letter to the editor). Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30(2): 222–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, R. Mixed EEG/MEG imaging: a way forward. In: J. Neonen, H.-M. Rajala and T. Katila (Eds.), Biomagnetic Localization and 3D Modelling. Report TKK-F-A689, Helsinki University of Technology, 1991: 125–135.

  • Ilmoniemi, R.J., Hämäläinen, M.S., Knuutila, J. The forward and inverse problems in the spherical model. In: H. Weinberg, G. Stroink and T. Katila (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Applications and Theory. New York, Pergamon Press, 1985: 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, A.A., Bolton, J.P.R., Hasson, R. and Clarke, C.J.S. Localised and distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem II. In: S.J. Williamson et al. (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, 1989a: 591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, A.A., Hasson, R. and Bolton, J.P.R. Spatial and temporal evolution of brain activity. Open University video, July 1989b.

  • Ioannides, A.A., Bolton, J.P.R. and Clarke, C.J.S. Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems, 1990a, 6: 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, A.A., Hasson, R. and Miseldine, G.J. Model-dependent noise elimination and distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem. In: A.F. Gmitro, P.S. Idell and I.J. Lahaie (Eds.), Digital Image Synthesis and Inverse Optics. Proc SPIE 1351, 1990b: 471–481.

  • Ioannides, A.A., Hellstrand, E. and Abraham-Fuchs, K. Point and distributed current density analysis of interictal epileptic activity recorded by Magnetoencephalography. Physiological Measurement, 1993, 14: 121–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, A.A. Comparison of MEG with other functional imaging techniques. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement., 1991, 12 suppl A: 23–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauijzer, W.J.J., Stok, C.J., Reits, D., Dunajsk, A., Lopes da Silva, F.H. and Peters, M.J. Neuromagnetic fields evoked by a patterned on-offset stimulus. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1985, 32: 455–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, J.C., Lewis, P.S., Leahy, R. and Singh, M. Multiple dipole modelling of spatio-temporal MEG data. In: A.F. Gmitro, P.S. Idell and I.J. Lahaie (Eds.), Digital Image Synthesis and Inverse Optics. Proc SPIE 1351,1990: 471–375.

  • Narici, L., Modena, I., Opsomer, R.J., Pixxella, V., Romani, G.L., Torrioli, G., Traversa, R. and Rossini, P.M. Neuromagnetic somatosensory homunculus: a non-invasive approach in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 1991, 121: 51–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, P.L. The brain's magnetic field: some effects of multiple sources on localization methods. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 63: 75–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou, A.C., Baumann, S.B., Rogers, R.L., Saydjari, C., Amparo, E.G. and Eisenberg, H.M. Localization of auditory response sources using MEG and MRI. Arch. Neurol., 1990a, 47: 33–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou, A.C., Rogers, R.L., Baumann, S.B., Saydjari, C. and Eisenberg, H.M. Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures. Exp. Brain Res., 1990b, 80: 44–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribary, U., Ioannides, A.A., Singh, K.D., Hasson, R., Bolton, J.P.R., Lado, F., Mogilner, A. and Llinas, R. Magnetic Field Tomography (MFT) of coherent thalamo-cortical 40 Hz oscillations in humans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1991, 88: 11037–11041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 344–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K.D. The development of biomagnetic systems: planar gradiometers and software tools, PhD thesis, Chapters 5 and 6, Open University, 1991.

  • Singh, K.D., Ioannides, A.A., Hasson, R., Ribary, U., Lado, F. and Llinas, R. Extraction of dynamic patterns from distributed current solutions of brain activity. In: M. Hoke et al. (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical aspects. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992: 767–771.

  • Snyder, A.Z. Dipole source localization in the study of EP generators: a critique. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 321–325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, J.H. Physical concepts and mathematical models. In: S.J. Williamson, G.L. Romani, L. Kaufman and I. Modena (Eds.), Biomagnetism: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York, 1983: 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S. MEG versus EEG localization test (letter to the editor). Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30(2): 222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, T., Williamson, S.J., Kaufman, L., Nicholson, C. and Llinas, R. Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1988, 85: 8732–8736.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toannides, A.A., Singh, K.D., Hasson, R. et al. Comparison of single current dipole and Magnetic Field Tomography analyses of the cortical response to auditory stimuli. Brain Topogr 6, 27–34 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234124

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234124

Key words

Navigation