Log in

Shoot regeneration of mesophyll protoplasts transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, not achievable with untransformed protoplasts

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Alternative methods for shoot regeneration in protoplast derived cultures were developed in Nicotiana paniculata and Physalis minima. In both species protoplast derived callus is not regeneratable to shoots by conventional methods, e.g. hormone treatment. Leaf discs and stem segments of N. paniculata and P. minima were incubated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens “shooter” strains harbouring pGV 2215 or pGV 2298 or wildtype strain B6S3. After 36 h of co-incubation protoplasts were prepared. (Leaf disc and stem segment cloning). Co-cultivation experiments were also undertaken with protoplasts of both species. Transformed clones, characterized by their hormone independent growth and octopine production, could be isolated after about two months. Transformation frequencies of “leaf disc and stem segment cloning” and co-cultivation experiments varied from 5×10−3 to 5×10−5. After about one year of cultivation on hormone-free culture medium, shoots could be recovered from colonies of N. paniculata, transformed by the strain harbouring pGV 2298. In protoplast derived colonies of P. minima, shoot induction was obtained only after transformation by bacteria carrying pGV 2215. This demonstrates the importance of the particular “shooter” mutant, as well as the response of the host plant. Transformed shoots of P. minima produced octopine, whereas octopine production in transformed shoots and callus of N. paniculata was undetectable after one year of cultivation, though T-DNA was still present in the plant genome. Transformed shoots of N. paniculata and P. minima do not produce any roots. Shoots of N. paniculata have an especially tumerous phenotype. Shoots of both species were successfully grafted to normal donor plants of N. tabacum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B5-h:

Gamborg medium without hormones (Gamborg 1968)

V47:

protoplast medium (Binding 1974)

D2a:

protoplast medium (Li et al. 1980)

MS-h:

Murashige and Skoog medium without hormones (Murashige and Skoog 1962)

References

  • Bapat VA, Schieder O (1981) Protoplast culture of several members of the genus Physalis. Plant Cell Rep 1:69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry GF, Rogers SG, Fraley RT, Brand L (1984) Identification of a cloned cytokinin biosynthetic gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4776–4780

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H (1974) Regeneration von haploiden und diploiden Pflanzen aus Protoplasten von Petunia hybrida L. Z Pflanzenphysiol 74:327–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgin J-P, Chupeau Y, Missonier C (1979) Plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of several Nicotiana species. Physiol Plant 45:288–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton MD, Currier TC, Farrand SK, Bendich AJ, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1974) Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA and PS8 Bacteriophage DNA not detected in crown gall tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3672–3676

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Kumar A (1983) Higher plant protoplasts-retrospect and prospect. Int Rev Cytol Suppl 16:219–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hain R, Steinbiss H-H, Schell J (1984) Fusion of Agrobacterium and E. coli spheroplasts with Nicotiana tabacum protoplasts — Direct gene transfer from microorganism to higher plant. Plant Cell Rep 3:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasezawa S, Nagata T, Syono K (1981) Transformation of Vinca protoplasts mediated by Agrobacterium spheroplasts. Mol Gen Genet 182:206–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemans J, Deblaere R, Willmitzer L, De Greve H, Hernalsteens JP, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1982) Genetic identification of functions of TL-DNA transcripts in octopine crown galls. EMBO J 1:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yan Q, Huang M, Sun Y, Li W (1980) Division of cells regenerated from mesophyll protoplast of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In: Ferenczy L, Farkas GL (eds) Advances in protoplast research. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, pp 261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Márton L, Wullems GJ, Molendijk L, Schilperoort RA (1979) In vitro transformation of cultured cells from Nicotiana tabacum by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 277:129–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ooms G, Hooykaas PJJ, Moolenaar G, Schilperoort RA (1981) Crown gall plant tumors of abnormal morphology, induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying mutated octopine Ti plasmids; analysis of T-DNA functions. Gene 14:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten LABM, Schilperoort RA (1978) A rapid micro scale method for the detection of lysopine and nopaline dehydrogenase activities. Biochim Biophys Acta 527:497–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit A, Tempé J, Kerr A, Holsters M, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1978) Substrate induction of conjugative activity of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmids. Nature 271:570–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieder O (1984) Isolation and culture of protoplasts: Datura. In: Vasil I (ed) Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 350–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder G, Waffenschmidt S, Weiler EW, Schroeder J (1984) The T-region of Ti-plasmids codes for an enzyme synthesizing indole-3-acetic acid. Eur J Biochem 138:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Slogteren GMS, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1984) Silent T-DNA genes in plant lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens are activated by grafting and by 5- azacytidine treatment. Plant Mol Biol 3:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmitzer L, Simons G, Schell J (1982) The TL-DNA in octopine crown gall tumours codes for seven well-defined polyadenylated transcripts. EMBO J 1:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Woestemeyer A, Otten LABM, Schell JSt (1984) Sexual transmission of T-DNA in abnormal tobacco regenerants transformed by octopine and nopaline strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Gen Genet 194:500–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullems GJ, Molendijk L, Ooms G, Schilperoort RA (1981) Differential expression of crown gall tumor markers in transformants obtained after in vitro Agrobacterium tumefaciens-induced transformation of cell wall regenerating protoplasts derived from Nicotiana tabacum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4344–4348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Dedicated to Professor Dr. G. Melchers in occasion of his 80th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steffen, A., Eriksson, T. & Schieder, O. Shoot regeneration of mesophyll protoplasts transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, not achievable with untransformed protoplasts. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 135–140 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261469

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261469

Key words

Navigation