Log in

Electron microscopy of urinary calculi — Some facts and artefacts

  • Originals
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Material in urinary calculi is prone to irradiation damage during electron microscopy and this suggests the need for care in the interpretation of data. It is shown, however, that minimum-dose transmission microscopy is feasible for single-crystal electron diffraction work, and that although internal damage in severe, morphological artefacts are unlikely in the SEM unless the incident electron flux is greater than 10-13 A nm-2. During EDX micro-analysis, the detection of light elements is impaired by irradiation effects unless a minimum-dose procedure is used. For the preparation of SEM samples, artefacts can be created by cleaving air-dried material-and it is therefore important to consider more lengthy preparation methods such as cryogenics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates JK, Jardine LJ, Steindler MJ (1982) Hydration aging of nuclear waste glass. Science 218:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bursill LA, Thomas JM, Rao KJ (1981) Stability of zeolites under electron irradiation and imaging of heavy cations in silicates. Nature 289:157–158

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calvo FA, Guilemany JM, Gomez De Salazar JM (1980) The contribution of SEM-EDAX and EPMA to the study of the structure and genesis of Spanish mercury ores. Proc Electron Microscopy 1980, The Hague, pp 456–457

  4. Hirsch EH (1981) Matters — arising from stability of zeolites under electron irradiation. Nature 293:759

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer AS, Finlayson B, DuBois L (1971) Direct observation of urinary stone ultrastructure. Br J Urol 43:154–163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Misell DL (1978) Image analysis, enhancement and interpretation. North-Holland, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodgers AL, Nassimbeni LR, Mulder KJ (1982) A multiple technique approach to the analysis of urinary calculi. Urol Res 10:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spector M, Jameson LH (1976) Scanning electron microscopy of urinary calculi. Proc SEM 1976 IIT Research Institute Chicago, pp 307–314

  9. Spector M, Garden N, Rous S (1978) Ultrastructure and pathogenesis of human urinary calculi. Br J Urol 50:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spector M, Lilga JC (to be published) High voltage electron microscopy of urinary calculi.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, D. Electron microscopy of urinary calculi — Some facts and artefacts. Urol. Res. 12, 17–22 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256304

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256304

Key words

Navigation