Log in

Economies of scale in bus transit: A review of concepts and evidence

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of returns of scale in bus transit continues to be a subject of debate among transportation analysts. From a public policy perspective, returns to scale are relevant to many policy areas such as transit service pricing, cost allocation, productivity and organization of the industry. Empirical studies conducted during the past decade have generated conflicting results. Constant, decreasing and increasing returns to scale have all been reported.

This paper identifies the sources of these conflicting results: confusion regarding the concept of scale economies, variable definition, assumptions regarding the shape of the cost function, and certain characteristics of the data base. The paper also discusses the theoretical concept of scale economies, and an interpretation of the concept for bus transit is presented. It is concluded that recent studies which have utilized generalized cost functions more accurately represent the economic structure of bus transit, and provide a stronger basis for transit policy analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, E. E. and Friedlaender, A. F. (1982). “Market structure and multiproduct industries”, Journal of Economic Literature 22: 1004–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1976). “Scale economies, average cost, and the profitability of marginal cost pricing”, in R. E. Grieson, ed., Public and Urban Economics. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M. E. (1973). Urban Transport: Studies in Economic Policy, London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berechmann, J. (1983). “Costs, economies of scale and factor substitution in bus transport. An analysis”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XVII (1): 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berechman, J. and Giuliano, G. (1984). “Analysis of the cost structure of an urban bus transit property”, Transportation Research.

  • Boyd, J. H., Asher, N. J. and Wetzler, E. S. (1978). “Nontechnological innovation in urban transit, a comparison of some alternatives”, Journal of Urban Economics 5: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Swanson, J. A. (1980). “Productivity in U.S. railroads, 1951–1974”, Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1): 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherwony, W. and Mundle, S. (1980). “Transit cost allocation model development”, ASCE Transportation Engineering Journal 106 (TE1): 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomitz, K. M. and Lave, C. A. (1981). Part-time Labor, Work Rules, and Transit Costs. Final report. D.O.T., Urban, MA Transportation Administration report No. CA-I 1–0018. Irvine, CA, University of California, Institute of Transportation Studies and School of Social Sciences, (NTIS No. PB 81–180556).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, G. J., Glauthier, R. E. and Lave, C. A. (1978). “Performance indicators for transit management”, Transportation 7 (4): 365–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, G. J., Brenner, M. E., de la Rocha, O., Babitsky, T. T. and Faust, K. (1984). Indicators and Peer Groups for Transit Performance Analysis. Final Report. D.O.T., Urban, MA, Transportation Administration report No. CA-11–0026–2. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. and Viton, P. (1974). The Full Cost of Urban Transport. Part I: Economic Efficiency in Bus Operations: Preliminary Intermodal Comparisons and Policy Implications. Monogr. No. 19, Berkeley, CA, University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 174, (NTIS No. PB 248–145).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. R. (1974). “The determinants of costs and the cost function of urban bus transit 1960–1970”, Doctoral Dissertation, Syracuse University, Dissertation Abstracts International 35: 1288-A.

  • Friedlaender, A. F. and Spady, R. H. (1981). Freight Transport Regulation. The MIT Press.

  • Fuss, M., McFadden, D. and Mundlak, T. (1978). “A survey of functional forms in the econometric analysis of production”, in M. Fuss and D. McFadden, eds., Production Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G. (1981). “The effect of environmental factors on the efficiency of public transit service”, Transit Planning and Management, Transportation Research Board pp. 11–16.

  • Gold, B. (1981). “Changing perspectives on size, scale, and returns: An interpretive survey”, Journal of Economic Literature 19: 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1972). “Cost allocation in railroad regulation”, Bell Journal of Economics 3 (1): 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. G. (1977). “Economies of traffic density in the rail freight industry”, Bell Journal of Economics 8 (2): 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1972). Econometric Methods. 2nd edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. A., Beesley, M. E. and McGillivray, R. G. (1981). “Bus costing information in short-range planning: Survey of principles and practice”, Transportation Research Record 799: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, T. E. (1974). “Railroad costs, returns to scale and excess capacity”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 56 (2): 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K. (1970). “Economies of scale in bus transport: Some Indian experience”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 4 (1): 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K. (1972). “Economies of scale. II. Bus transport: Some United States experience”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 6 (2): 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. and Steedman, I. (1970). “Economies of scale in bus transport. I. Some British municipal results”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 4 (1): 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, R., Kemp, M. and Beesley, M. (1980). Urban Bus Transit Costing. Working paper No. 1200–72–1, Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1979). “The zero elasticity rule for pricing a government service: A summary of findings”, Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. R. and Gomez-Ibanez, J. A. (1975). Measurement and Analysis of Productivity in Transportation Industries. Discussion paper D75–6, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University, Dept. of City and Regional Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. R. (1970). “Differences among cities, differences among firms, and costs of urban bus transport”, Journal of Industrial Economics 19 (1): 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohring, H. (1972). “The peak-load problem with increasing returns and pricing constraints”, American Economics Review 62: 591–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohring, H. (1976). Transportation Economics. Ballinger.

  • Nelson, G. R. (1972). An Econometric Model of Urban Bus Transit Operations. Paper P-863, Arlington, VA, Institute for Defense Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oram, R. L. (1979). “Peak-period supplements: The contemporary economics of urban bus transport in the U.K. and U.S.A.”, Progress in Planning 2 (2): 81–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oum, T. H. (1979). “Derived demand for freight transportation and inter-modal competition in Canada”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 13 (2): 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozdena, R. J. (1976). A Methodology for Selecting Urban Transportation Projects. Monogr. No. 22, Berkeley, CA, University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. (1977). “Optimal transit prices under increasing returns to scale and loss constraint”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 11 (2): 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, J. F. (1973). Cost and Demand for Urban Bus Transit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, available from Xerox University Microfilms as No. 74-5723.

  • Viton, P. A. (1981). “A translog cost function for urban bus transit”, Journal of Industrial Economics 29 (3): 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wabe, J. S. and Coles, O. B. (1975). “The short and long-run cost of bus transport in urban areas”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 9 (2): 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L. and Dalal, A. (1981). “Estimation of the elasticities of factor substitution in urban bus transportation: A cost function approach”, Journal of Regional Science 21 (2): 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L. and Hall, C. (1981). “Returns to scale in the United States intercity bus industry”, Regional Science and Urban Economics 11: 573–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. G. (1977). “The cost of operating buses in U.S. cities”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 11 (1): 68–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berechman, J., Giuliano, G. Economies of scale in bus transit: A review of concepts and evidence. Transportation 12, 313–332 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165470

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165470

Keywords

Navigation